Previous News
  May, 2012
  April, 2012
  March, 2012
  February, 2012
  December, 2011
  November, 2011
  October, 2011
  September, 2011
  August, 2011
  July, 2011
  June, 2011
  May, 2011
  April, 2011
  February, 2011
  January, 2011
  December, 2010
  November, 2010
  October, 2010
  September, 2010
  August, 2010
  June, 2010
  May, 2010
  April, 2010
  March, 2010
  February, 2010
  January, 2010
  November, 2009
  September, 2009
  August, 2009
  July, 2009
  June, 2009
  April, 2009
  March, 2009
  February, 2009
  November, 2008
  October, 2008
  September, 2008
  August, 2008
  July, 2008
  June, 2008
  May, 2008
  April, 2008
  March, 2008
  February, 2008
  January, 2008
  November, 2007
  October, 2007
  August, 2007

 
Consider expanded sheriff’s department
This "Letter to the Editor" appeared in the "Carlisle Sentinel" on October 5, 2008 and is in response to House Bill # 2563

Consider expanded sheriff’s department

To the editor:

An alternative to municipalities being charged a $100 per resident fee for Pennsylvania State Police coverage may be no farther than the Maryland border.

Pennsylvania is surrounded by states that use their county sheriffs to patrol areas that do not have their own local police force. The county sheriff departments of Ohio, New Jersey and New York states have full police (arrest) powers and patrol unincorporated areas and provide assistance to local departments.

Maryland sheriffs (except for Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Baltimore City, Howard, Montgomery, and Prince George’s counties) are the primary law enforcement agencies for their counties.

West Virginia uses its sheriffs for law enforcement and collecting county taxes. Only in Pennsylvania are the trained, armed, uniformed and patrol vehicle driving deputies relegated to prisoner transport, court security and serving summonses. This is a tremendous waste of existing resources. If this is because “that’s the way it has always been,” it is not a reason; it is an excuse!

One would expect that costs to upgrade sheriffs departments for this expected role would be much less than the $31 million in new revenues, which would be quite a windfall for the Commonwealth.

Small municipal police departments formed due to this legislation would always be in search of operating revenue, possibly in the form of traffic violation fines.

There is no reason to reinvent the wheel with this issue.

Just look beyond Pennsylvania!

Tony Gonzalez Sr., member
South Middleton Township Planning Commission